↓ Skip to main content

Morvan’s syndrome and myasthenia gravis related to familial Mediterranean fever gene mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morvan’s syndrome and myasthenia gravis related to familial Mediterranean fever gene mutations
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12974-016-0533-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junpei Koge, Shintaro Hayashi, Hiroyuki Murai, Jun Yokoyama, Yuri Mizuno, Taira Uehara, Naoyasu Ueda, Osamu Watanabe, Hiroshi Takashima, Jun-ichi Kira

Abstract

We present the first case of Morvan's syndrome (MoS) and myasthenia gravis (MG) related to familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) gene mutations. A 40-year-old woman with a 1-year history of bilateral ptosis and limb muscle weakness presented to our hospital. She also had memory impairment, insomnia, hyperhidrosis, and muscle twitches. Electromyography confirmed widespread myokymia, and there was evidence of temporal region dysfunction on electroencephalography. Anti-voltage-gated potassium channel complex antibodies and anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies were both positive. Edrophonium administration was effective for bilateral ptosis and muscle weakness. She and her family experienced self-limiting febrile attacks with arthralgia, which led us to suspect FMF. Genetic analyses revealed compound heterozygous mutations in exon 2 of the MEFV gene (L110P/E148Q). From these findings, a diagnosis of MoS and MG complicated with MEFV gene mutations was made. Intravenous high-dose corticosteroids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulin resulted in only transient, limited improvement, and frequent relapses, especially in the myasthenic symptoms. Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α were markedly elevated in the serum, which was considered to be derived from the MEFV mutations and responsible for the resistance to immunotherapy. The present case illustrates a possible link between auto-inflammation and auto-antibody-mediated neurological diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 35%
Neuroscience 7 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2016.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#2,604
of 2,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,340
of 315,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#49
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.