You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prognostic accuracy of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS criteria in hematological cancer patients: a retrospective multicenter study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-019-0396-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lucie Probst, Enrico Schalk, Tobias Liebregts, Vanja Zeremski, Asterios Tzalavras, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon, Nina Hesse, Johanna Prinz, Jörg Janne Vehreschild, Alexander Shimabukuro-Vornhagen, Dennis A. Eichenauer, Jorge Garcia Borrega, Matthias Kochanek, Boris Böll |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 7 | 37% |
Spain | 2 | 11% |
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Brazil | 1 | 5% |
Russia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 84% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 47% |
Engineering | 5 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,982,555
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#151
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,809
of 346,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them