You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pre-radiotherapy feeding tube identifies a poor prognostic subset of postoperative p16 positive oropharyngeal carcinoma patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Radiation Oncology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13014-014-0314-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vivek Verma, Jingxia Liu, Laura Eschen, Jonathan Danieley, Christopher Spencer, James S Lewis, Jason Diaz, Jay F Piccirillo, Douglas R Adkins, Brian Nussenbaum, Wade L Thorstad, Hiram A Gay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 27% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 23% |
Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 42% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,796,099
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,277
of 2,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,737
of 352,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#55
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.