You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integration of a nationally procured electronic health record system into user work practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathrin M Cresswell, Allison Worth, Aziz Sheikh |
| Abstract |
Evidence suggests that many small- and medium-scale Electronic Health Record (EHR) implementations encounter problems, these often stemming from users' difficulties in accommodating the new technology into their work practices. There is the possibility that these challenges may be exacerbated in the context of the larger-scale, more standardised, implementation strategies now being pursued as part of major national modernisation initiatives. We sought to understand how England's centrally procured and delivered EHR software was integrated within the work practices of users in selected secondary and specialist care settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 14% |
| Researcher | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 37 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 34 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,166,652
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,043
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,739
of 169,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.