↓ Skip to main content

Proposal for a screening questionnaire for detecting habitual mouth breathing, based on a mouth-breathing habit score

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proposal for a screening questionnaire for detecting habitual mouth breathing, based on a mouth-breathing habit score
Published in
BMC Oral Health, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12903-018-0672-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masahiro Sano, Sayaka Sano, Hiromasa Kato, Ken Arakawa, Masaaki Arai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 42 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Unspecified 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 45 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,687,330
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#1,026
of 1,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,919
of 436,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#29
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.