You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility and usefulness of a leadership intervention to implement evidence-based falls prevention practices in residential care in Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-019-0485-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendy Gifford, Krystina B. Lewis, Ann Catrine Eldh, Val Fiset, Tara Abdul-Fatah, Anna Cristina Aberg, Kednapa Thavorn, Ian D. Graham, Lars Wallin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#14,454,522
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#668
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,919
of 342,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.