You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How we read: the combined use of MRI and novel PET tracers for the characterisation and treatment planning of masses in neuro-oncology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Imaging, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40644-019-0241-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Arian Lasocki, Rodney J. Hicks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 29% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#16,057,393
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Imaging
#239
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,952
of 352,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Imaging
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.