↓ Skip to main content

Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011)

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011)
Published in
Trials, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-78
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sangeetha Paramasivan, Robert Huddart, Emma Hall, Rebecca Lewis, Alison Birtle, Jenny L Donovan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 101 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 21%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 28 27%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Psychology 9 9%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 17 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#9,544,656
of 16,227,909 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,631
of 4,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,141
of 266,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,227,909 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them