You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ophthalmology, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12886-018-0785-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chu Luan Nguyen, Lawrence J. Oh, Eugene Wong, Joe Wei, Michael Chilov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 41% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,496,019
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#356
of 2,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,013
of 330,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.