You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Current understanding of the gut microbiota shaping mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Science, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12929-019-0554-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cherng-Shyang Chang, Cheng-Yuan Kao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 203 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 21% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 67 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 26 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 72 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#304
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,064
of 351,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.