↓ Skip to main content

The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Education, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1755-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Lerchenfeldt, Misa Mi, Marty Eng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 311 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Student > Postgraduate 23 7%
Lecturer 21 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 5%
Other 76 24%
Unknown 115 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Psychology 11 4%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Arts and Humanities 9 3%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 123 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,138,421
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,253
of 3,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,091
of 341,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#41
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.