↓ Skip to main content

En1 and Wnt signaling in midbrain dopaminergic neuronal development

Overview of attention for article published in Neural Development, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 232)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
En1 and Wnt signaling in midbrain dopaminergic neuronal development
Published in
Neural Development, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1749-8104-6-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria TM Alves dos Santos, Marten P Smidt

Abstract

Dopaminergic neurons of the ventral mesodiencephalon are affected in significant health disorders such as Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and addiction. The ultimate goal of current research endeavors is to improve the clinical treatment of such disorders, such as providing a protocol for cell replacement therapy in Parkinson's disease that will successfully promote the specific differentiation of a stem cell into a dopaminergic neuronal phenotype. Decades of research on the developmental mechanisms of the mesodiencephalic dopaminergic (mdDA) system have led to the identification of many signaling pathways and transcription factors critical in its development. The unraveling of these pathways will help fill in the pieces of the puzzle that today dominates neurodevelopment research: how to make and maintain a mdDA neuron. In the present review, we provide an overview of the mdDA system, the processes and signaling molecules involved in its genesis, with a focus on the transcription factor En1 and the canonical Wnt pathway, highlighting recent findings on their relevance--and interplay--in the development and maintenance of the mdDA system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 183 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 25%
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 33 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 14%
Neuroscience 22 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 37 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,138,465
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neural Development
#15
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,743
of 121,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neural Development
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them