↓ Skip to main content

Ideal and actual involvement of community pharmacists in health promotion and prevention: a cross-sectional study in Quebec, Canada

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ideal and actual involvement of community pharmacists in health promotion and prevention: a cross-sectional study in Quebec, Canada
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Claude Laliberté, Sylvie Perreault, Nicole Damestoy, Lyne Lalonde

Abstract

An increased interest is observed in broadening community pharmacists' role in public health. To date, little information has been gathered in Canada on community pharmacists' perceptions of their role in health promotion and prevention; however, such data are essential to the development of public-health programs in community pharmacy. A cross-sectional study was therefore conducted to explore the perceptions of community pharmacists in urban and semi-urban areas regarding their ideal and actual levels of involvement in providing health-promotion and prevention services and the barriers to such involvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 212 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 25%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Researcher 14 6%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 53 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 49 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Psychology 9 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 61 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2012.
All research outputs
#3,161,705
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,601
of 14,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,450
of 156,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#27
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.