↓ Skip to main content

Fellow travellers: a concordance of colonization patterns between mice and men in the North Atlantic region

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
42 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fellow travellers: a concordance of colonization patterns between mice and men in the North Atlantic region
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

EP Jones, K Skirnisson, TH McGovern, MTP Gilbert, E Willerslev, JB Searle

Abstract

House mice (Mus musculus) are commensals of humans and therefore their phylogeography can reflect human colonization and settlement patterns. Previous studies have linked the distribution of house mouse mitochondrial (mt) DNA clades to areas formerly occupied by the Norwegian Vikings in Norway and the British Isles. Norwegian Viking activity also extended further westwards in the North Atlantic with the settlement of Iceland, short-lived colonies in Greenland and a fleeting colony in Newfoundland in 1000 AD. Here we investigate whether house mouse mtDNA sequences reflect human history in these other regions as well.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 88 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 22%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#896,375
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#179
of 3,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,205
of 172,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.