↓ Skip to main content

Advance care planning – a multi-centre cluster randomised clinical trial: the research protocol of the ACTION study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advance care planning – a multi-centre cluster randomised clinical trial: the research protocol of the ACTION study
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12885-016-2298-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith A. C. Rietjens, Ida J. Korfage, Lesley Dunleavy, Nancy J. Preston, Lea J. Jabbarian, Caroline Arnfeldt Christensen, Maja de Brito, Francesco Bulli, Glenys Caswell, Branka Červ, Johannes van Delden, Luc Deliens, Giuseppe Gorini, Mogens Groenvold, Dirk Houttekier, Francesca Ingravallo, Marijke C. Kars, Urška Lunder, Guido Miccinesi, Alenka Mimić, Eugenio Paci, Sheila Payne, Suzanne Polinder, Kristian Pollock, Jane Seymour, Anja Simonič, Anna Thit Johnsen, Mariëtte N. Verkissen, Esther de Vries, Andrew Wilcock, Marieke Zwakman, Agnes van der Heide (Pl)

Abstract

Awareness of preferences regarding medical care should be a central component of the care of patients with advanced cancer. Open communication can facilitate this but can occur in an ad hoc or variable manner. Advance care planning (ACP) is a formalized process of communication between patients, relatives and professional caregivers about patients' values and care preferences. It raises awareness of the need to anticipate possible future deterioration of health. ACP has the potential to improve current and future healthcare decision-making, provide patients with a sense of control, and improve their quality of life. We will study the effects of the ACP program Respecting Choices on the quality of life of patients with advanced lung or colorectal cancer. In a phase III multicenter cluster randomised controlled trial, 22 hospitals in 6 countries will be randomised. In the intervention sites, patients will be offered interviews with a trained facilitator. In the control sites, patients will receive care as usual. In total, 1360 patients will be included. All participating patients will be asked to complete questionnaires at inclusion, and again after 2.5 and 4.5 months. If a patient dies within a year after inclusion, a relative will be asked to complete a questionnaire on end-of-life care. Use of medical care will be assessed by checking medical files. The primary endpoint is patients' quality of life at 2.5 months post-inclusion. Secondary endpoints are the extent to which care as received is aligned with patients' preferences, patients' evaluation of decision-making processes, quality of end-of-life care and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. A complementary qualitative study will be carried out to explore the lived experience of engagement with the Respecting Choices program from the perspectives of patients, their Personal Representatives, healthcare providers and facilitators. Transferring the concept of ACP from care of the elderly to patients with advanced cancer, who on average are younger and retain their mental capacity for a larger part of their disease trajectory, is an important next step in an era of increased focus on patient centered healthcare and shared decision-making. International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN63110516 . Date of registration: 10/3/2014.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 296 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 17%
Researcher 37 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 87 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 59 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 19%
Social Sciences 21 7%
Psychology 21 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 101 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,662,196
of 26,332,460 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#245
of 9,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,653
of 317,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#7
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,332,460 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,248 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.