You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How is the theoretical domains framework applied to developing health behaviour interventions? A systematic search and narrative synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7442-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona Cowdell, Judith Dyson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
| Ireland | 2 | 17% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 165 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 16% |
| Psychology | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 61 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,175,632
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,892
of 16,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,147
of 346,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#94
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.