The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0901-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Abimanyi-Ochom, Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, Max Catchpool, Marnie Firipis, Sithara Wanni Arachchige Dona, Jennifer J. Watts |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 21% |
| Unknown | 46 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,422,943
of 26,233,885 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#142
of 2,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,562
of 352,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,233,885 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.