↓ Skip to main content

In vivo assessment of the host reactions to the biodegradation of the two novel magnesium alloys ZEK100 and AX30 in an animal model

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vivo assessment of the host reactions to the biodegradation of the two novel magnesium alloys ZEK100 and AX30 in an animal model
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-925x-11-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Andreas Huehnerschulte, Janin Reifenrath, Brigitte von Rechenberg, Dina Dziuba, Jan Marten Seitz, Dirk Bormann, Henning Windhagen, Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg

Abstract

Most studies on biodegradable magnesium implants published recently use magnesium-calcium-alloys or magnesium-aluminum-rare earth-alloys.However, since rare earths are a mixture of elements and their toxicity is unclear, a reduced content of rare earths is favorable. The present study assesses the in vivo biocompatibility of two new magnesium alloys which have a reduced content (ZEK100) or contain no rare earths at all (AX30).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 28%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Engineering 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#564
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,613
of 159,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.