You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Congenital bronchopulmonary foregut malformation: systematic review of the literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12887-019-1686-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gang Yang, Lina Chen, Chang Xu, Miao Yuan, Yuan Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 41% |
Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,255,873
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#789
of 3,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,645
of 340,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#15
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.