You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Left breast irradiation with tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) versus tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy (t-VMAT): trade-offs between secondary cancer induction risk and optimal target coverage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13014-019-1363-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Karpf, Mazen Sakka, Martin Metzger, Gerhard G. Grabenbauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 28% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 46 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#14,170,799
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#763
of 2,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,533
of 340,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#9
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,081 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.