↓ Skip to main content

Gestational weight gain outside the Institute of Medicine recommendations and adverse pregnancy outcomes: analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gestational weight gain outside the Institute of Medicine recommendations and adverse pregnancy outcomes: analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12884-019-2472-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ewelina Rogozińska, Javier Zamora, Nadine Marlin, Ana Pilar Betrán, Arne Astrup, Annick Bogaerts, Jose G. Cecatti, Jodie M. Dodd, Fabio Facchinetti, Nina R. W. Geiker, Lene A. H. Haakstad, Hans Hauner, Dorte M. Jensen, Tarja I. Kinnunen, Ben W. J. Mol, Julie Owens, Suzanne Phelan, Kristina M. Renault, Kjell Å. Salvesen, Alexis Shub, Fernanda G. Surita, Signe N. Stafne, Helena Teede, Mireille N. M. van Poppel, Christina A. Vinter, Khalid S. Khan, Shakila Thangaratinam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 299 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Researcher 17 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 127 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 56 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Psychology 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 140 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,515,005
of 25,302,890 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#960
of 4,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,717
of 347,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#14
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,302,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.