You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Batch effect exerts a bigger influence on the rat urinary metabolome and gut microbiota than uraemia: a cautionary tale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-019-0738-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David William Randall, Julius Kieswich, Jonathan Swann, Kieran McCafferty, Christoph Thiemermann, Michael Curtis, Lesley Hoyles, Muhammed Magdi Yaqoob |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,256,010
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#897
of 1,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,640
of 340,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.