You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional exosome-mediated co-delivery of doxorubicin and hydrophobically modified microRNA 159 for triple-negative breast cancer therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-019-0526-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chunai Gong, Jing Tian, Zhuo Wang, Yuan Gao, Xin Wu, Xueying Ding, Lei Qiang, Guorui Li, Zhimin Han, Yongfang Yuan, Shen Gao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 68 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 77 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,220,155
of 23,376,718 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#110
of 1,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,697
of 341,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,376,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.