↓ Skip to main content

A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-4-48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Gardner, Rosemary Davidson, John McAteer, Susan Michie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
Saudi Arabia 1 2%
Peru 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 39 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Psychology 6 13%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#5,555,123
of 18,796,975 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,072
of 1,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,239
of 273,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,796,975 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.