You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fidelity and moderating factors in complex interventions: a case study of a continuum of care program for frail elderly people in health and social care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-23 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henna Hasson, Staffan Blomberg, Anna Dunér |
| Abstract |
Prior studies measuring fidelity of complex interventions have mainly evaluated adherence, and not taken factors affecting adherence into consideration. A need for studies that clarify the concept of fidelity and the function of factors moderating fidelity has been emphasized. The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate implementation fidelity and possible factors influencing fidelity of a complex care continuum intervention for frail elderly people. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 23% |
| Researcher | 44 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 12% |
| Psychology | 25 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 47 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2012.
All research outputs
#6,496,106
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,045
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,821
of 172,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#18
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.