↓ Skip to main content

Validity of ultrasound muscle thickness measurements for predicting leg skeletal muscle mass in healthy Japanese middle-aged and older individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiological Anthropology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity of ultrasound muscle thickness measurements for predicting leg skeletal muscle mass in healthy Japanese middle-aged and older individuals
Published in
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1880-6805-32-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yohei Takai, Megumi Ohta, Ryota Akagi, Emika Kato, Taku Wakahara, Yasuo Kawakami, Tetsuo Fukunaga, Hiroaki Kanehisa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 88 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 34%
Sports and Recreations 19 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Engineering 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 21 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2016.
All research outputs
#11,061,876
of 12,443,702 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#151
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,275
of 269,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,443,702 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.