You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical comparative effectiveness of acupuncture versus manual therapy treatment of lateral epicondylitis: feasibility randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-019-0490-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrine Bostrøm, Sverre Mæhlum, Milada Cvancarova Småstuen, Kjersti Storheim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 62 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 16% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 64 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,418,285
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#568
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,266
of 340,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.