You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Care management for Type 2 diabetes in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-72 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jason S Egginton, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Nilay D Shah, Saranya Balasubramaniam, Joann R Emmanuel, Larry J Prokop, Victor M Montori, Mohammad Hassan Murad |
Abstract |
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at assessing the composition and performance of care management models evaluated in the last decade and their impact on patient important outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 98 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Other | 19 | 18% |
Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 15 | 15% |
Unknown | 20 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,413,245
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,671
of 7,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,598
of 160,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#29
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.