↓ Skip to main content

The moral imperative to approve pregnant women’s participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 205)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The moral imperative to approve pregnant women’s participation in randomized clinical trials for pregnancy and newborn complications
Published in
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13010-019-0081-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan Kabonge Kaye

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 16 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,057,612
of 19,247,712 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#27
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,950
of 277,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,247,712 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them