You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The genome anatomy of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis VD57 a highly virulent strain causing Caseous lymphadenitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Microbiome, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40793-016-0149-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sintia Almeida, Sandeep Tiwari, Diego Mariano, Flávia Souza, Syed Babar Jamal, Nilson Coimbra, Roberto Tadeu Raittz, Fernanda Alves Dorella, Alex Fiorine de Carvalho, Felipe Luiz Pereira, Siomar de Castro Soares, Carlos Augusto Gomes Leal, Debmalya Barh, Preetam Ghosh, Henrique Figueiredo, Lília Ferreira Moura-Costa, Ricardo Wagner Portela, Roberto Meyer, Artur Silva, Vasco Azevedo |
| Abstract |
Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis strain VD57 (Cp_VD57), a highly virulent, nonmotile, non-sporulating, and a mesophilic bacterium, was isolated from a goat's granulomatous lesion in the municipality of Juazeiro, Bahia State, Brazil. Here, we describe a set of features of the strain, together with the details of its complete genome sequence and annotation. The genome comprises of a 2.5 Mbp long, single circular genome with 2,101 protein-coding genes, 12 rRNA, 49 tRNA and 47 pseudogenes and a G + C content of 52.85 %. Genetic variation was detected in Cp_VD57 using C. pseudotuberculosis strain 1002 as reference, wherein small genomic insertions and deletions were identified. The comparative analysis of the genome sequence provides means to better understand the host pathogen interactions of this strain and can also help us to understand the molecular and genetic basis of virulence of this bacterium. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 23% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2016.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#459
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,341
of 315,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.