↓ Skip to main content

Joint torque variability and repeatability during cyclic flexion-extension of the elbow

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Joint torque variability and repeatability during cyclic flexion-extension of the elbow
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13102-016-0033-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurent Ballaz, Maxime Raison, Christine Detrembleur, Guillaume Gaudet, Martin Lemay

Abstract

Joint torques are generally of primary importance for clinicians to analyze the effect of a surgery and to obtain an indicator of functional capability to perform a motion. Given the current need to standardize the functional evaluation of the upper limb, the aim of this paper is to assess (1) the variability of the calculated maximal elbow joint torque during cyclic elbow flexion-extension movements and (2) participant test-retest repeatability in healthy young adults. Calculations were based on an existing non-invasive method including kinematic identification and inverse dynamics processes. Twelve healthy young adults (male n = 6) performed 10 elbow flexion-extension movement carrying five different dumbbells (0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 kg) with several flexion-extension frequencies (½, (1)/3, ¼ Hz) to evaluate peak elbow joint torques. Whatever the condition, the variability coefficient of trial peak torques remained under 4 %. Bland and Altman plot also showed good test-retest, whatever the frequency conditions for the 0, 1, 2, and 3 kg conditions. The good repeatability of the flexion-extension peak torques represents a key step to standardize the functional evaluation of the upper limb.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 35%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Sports and Recreations 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,450,346
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#417
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,362
of 300,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.