You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dermal fibroblasts display similar phenotypic and differentiation capacity to fat-derived mesenchymal stem cells, but differ in anti-inflammatory and angiogenic potential
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vascular Cell, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-824x-3-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonella Blasi, Carmela Martino, Luigi Balducci, Marilisa Saldarelli, Antonio Soleti, Stefania E Navone, Laura Canzi, Silvia Cristini, Gloria Invernici, Eugenio A Parati, Giulio Alessandri |
| Abstract |
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent stem cells able to differentiate into different cell lineages. However, MSCs represent a subpopulation of a more complex cell composition of stroma cells contained in mesenchymal tissue. Due to a lack of specific markers, it is difficult to distinguish MSCs from other more mature stromal cells such as fibroblasts, which, conversely, are abundant in mesenchymal tissue. In order to find more distinguishing features between MSCs and fibroblasts, we studied the phenotypic and functional features of human adipose-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) side by side with normal human dermal fibroblasts (HNDFs) in vitro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,755,956
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Cell
#3
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,304
of 194,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Cell
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them