↓ Skip to main content

Differentiation of the brain vasculature: the answer came blowing by the Wnt

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Cell, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differentiation of the brain vasculature: the answer came blowing by the Wnt
Published in
Vascular Cell, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/2040-2384-2-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Liebner, Karl H Plate

Abstract

Vascularization of the vertebrate brain takes place during embryonic development from a preformed perineural vascular plexus. As a consequence of the intimate contact with neuroectodermal cells the vessels, which are entering the brain exclusively via sprouting angiogenesis, acquire and maintain unique barrier properties known as the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The endothelial BBB depends upon the close association of endothelial cells with pericytes, astrocytes, neurons and microglia, which are summarized in the term neuro-vascular unit. Although it is known since decades that the CNS tissue provides the cues for BBB induction and differentiation in endothelial cells, the molecular mechanism remained obscure.Only recently, the canonical Wnt/beta-catenin pathway and the Wnt7a/7b growth factors have been implicated in brain angiogenesis on the one hand and in BBB induction on the other. This breakthrough in understanding the differentiation of the brain vasculature prompted us to review these findings embedded in the emerging concepts of Wnt signaling in the vasculature. In particular, interactions with other pathways that are crucial for vascular development such as VEGF, Notch, angiopoietins and Sonic hedgehog are discussed. Finally, we considered the potential role of the Wnt pathway in vascular brain pathologies in which BBB function is hampered, as for example in glioma, stroke and Alzheimer's disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Denmark 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 203 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 21%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Professor 10 5%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 25 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 14%
Neuroscience 22 10%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 32 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Cell
#47
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,725
of 173,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Cell
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.