↓ Skip to main content

Gender differences in gait kinematics for patients with knee osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender differences in gait kinematics for patients with knee osteoarthritis
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12891-016-1013-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angkoon Phinyomark, Sean T. Osis, Blayne A. Hettinga, Dylan Kobsar, Reed Ferber

Abstract

Females have a two-fold risk of developing knee osteoarthritis (OA) as compared to their male counterparts and atypical walking gait biomechanics are also considered a factor in the aetiology of knee OA. However, few studies have investigated sex-related differences in walking mechanics for patients with knee OA and of those, conflicting results have been reported. Therefore, this study was designed to examine the differences in gait kinematics (1) between male and female subjects with and without knee OA and (2) between healthy gender-matched subjects as compared with their OA counterparts. One hundred subjects with knee OA (45 males and 55 females) and 43 healthy subjects (18 males and 25 females) participated in this study. Three-dimensional kinematic data were collected during treadmill-walking and analysed using (1) a traditional approach based on discrete variables and (2) a machine learning approach based on principal component analysis (PCA) and support vector machine (SVM) using waveform data. OA and healthy females exhibited significantly greater knee abduction and hip adduction angles compared to their male counterparts. No significant differences were found in any discrete gait kinematic variable between OA and healthy subjects in either the male or female group. Using PCA and SVM approaches, classification accuracies of 98-100 % were found between gender groups as well as between OA groups. These results suggest that care should be taken to account for gender when investigating the biomechanical aetiology of knee OA and that gender-specific analysis and rehabilitation protocols should be developed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 239 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 19%
Student > Master 37 15%
Researcher 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 58 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 17%
Engineering 35 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 10%
Sports and Recreations 19 8%
Computer Science 9 4%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 77 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2016.
All research outputs
#4,316,908
of 23,573,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#850
of 4,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,097
of 302,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#21
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.