You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Requirements for guidelines systems: implementation challenges and lessons from existing software-engineering efforts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hemant Shah, Raymond D Allard, Robert Enberg, Ganesh Krishnan, Patricia Williams, Prakash M Nadkarni |
| Abstract |
A large body of work in the clinical guidelines field has identified requirements for guideline systems, but there are formidable challenges in translating such requirements into production-quality systems that can be used in routine patient care. Detailed analysis of requirements from an implementation perspective can be useful in helping define sub-requirements to the point where they are implementable. Further, additional requirements emerge as a result of such analysis. During such an analysis, study of examples of existing, software-engineering efforts in non-biomedical fields can provide useful signposts to the implementer of a clinical guideline system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 33 | 53% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,707
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,305
of 1,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,042
of 156,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#19
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.