↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and attitudes influencing non-engagement in a peer feedback model to inform evidence for GP appraisal

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers and attitudes influencing non-engagement in a peer feedback model to inform evidence for GP appraisal
Published in
BMC Medical Education, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-12-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther Curnock, Paul Bowie, Lindsey Pope, John McKay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Pakistan 1 2%
Unknown 48 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 35%
Social Sciences 8 15%
Psychology 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,143,536
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,943
of 3,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,655
of 160,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.