↓ Skip to main content

A cost-effectiveness analysis of provider interventions to improve health worker practice in providing treatment for uncomplicated malaria in Cameroon: a study protocol for a randomized controlled…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cost-effectiveness analysis of provider interventions to improve health worker practice in providing treatment for uncomplicated malaria in Cameroon: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia Wiseman, Lindsay J Mangham, Bonnie Cundill, Olivia A Achonduh, Akindeh Mbuh Nji, Abanda Ngu Njei, Clare Chandler, Wilfred F Mbacham

Abstract

Governments and donors all over Africa are searching for sustainable, affordable and cost-effective ways to improve the quality of malaria case management. Widespread deficiencies have been reported in the prescribing and counselling practices of health care providers treating febrile patients in both public and private health facilities. Cameroon is no exception with low levels of adherence to national guidelines, the frequent selection of non-recommended antimalarials and the use of incorrect dosages. This study evaluates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of introducing two different provider training packages, alongside rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), designed to equip providers with the knowledge and practical skills needed to effectively diagnose and treat febrile patients. The overall aim is to target antimalarial treatment better and to facilitate optimal use of malaria treatment guidelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Cambodia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 109 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Lecturer 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 29 26%