↓ Skip to main content

Key traveller groups of relevance to spatial malaria transmission: a survey of movement patterns in four sub-Saharan African countries

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Key traveller groups of relevance to spatial malaria transmission: a survey of movement patterns in four sub-Saharan African countries
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1252-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

John M. Marshall, Mahamoudou Touré, André Lin Ouédraogo, Micky Ndhlovu, Samson S. Kiware, Ashley Rezai, Emmy Nkhama, Jamie T. Griffin, T. Deirdre Hollingsworth, Seydou Doumbia, Nicodem J. Govella, Neil M. Ferguson, Azra C. Ghani

Abstract

As malaria prevalence declines in many parts of the world due to widescale control efforts and as drug-resistant parasites begin to emerge, a quantitative understanding of human movement is becoming increasingly relevant to malaria control. However, despite its importance, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding human movement, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. A quantitative survey of human movement patterns was conducted in four countries in sub-Saharan Africa: Mali, Burkina Faso, Zambia, and Tanzania, with three to five survey locations chosen in each country. Questions were included on demographic and trip details, malaria risk behaviour, children accompanying travellers, and mobile phone usage to enable phone signal data to be better correlated with movement. A total of 4352 individuals were interviewed and 6411 trips recorded. A cluster analysis of trips highlighted two distinct traveller groups of relevance to malaria transmission: women travelling with children (in all four countries) and youth workers (in Mali). Women travelling with children were more likely to travel to areas of relatively high malaria prevalence in Mali (OR = 4.46, 95 % CI = 3.42-5.83), Burkina Faso (OR = 1.58, 95 % CI = 1.23-1.58), Zambia (OR = 1.50, 95 % CI = 1.20-1.89), and Tanzania (OR = 2.28, 95 % CI = 1.71-3.05) compared to other travellers. They were also more likely to own bed nets in Burkina Faso (OR = 1.77, 95 % CI = 1.25-2.53) and Zambia (OR = 1.74, 95 % CI = 1.34 2.27), and less likely to own a mobile phone in Mali (OR = 0.50, 95 % CI = 0.39-0.65), Burkina Faso (OR = 0.39, 95 % CI = 0.30-0.52), and Zambia (OR = 0.60, 95 % CI = 0.47-0.76). Malian youth workers were more likely to travel to areas of relatively high malaria prevalence (OR = 23, 95 % CI = 17-31) and for longer durations (mean of 70 days cf 21 days, p < 0.001) compared to other travellers. Women travelling with children were a remarkably consistent traveller group across all four countries surveyed. They are expected to contribute greatly towards spatial malaria transmission because the children they travel with tend to have high parasite prevalence. Youth workers were a significant traveller group in Mali and are expected to contribute greatly to spatial malaria transmission because their movements correlate with seasonal rains and hence peak mosquito densities. Interventions aimed at interrupting spatial transmission of parasites should consider these traveller groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 136 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 21%
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Computer Science 8 6%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 42 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,867,545
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,537
of 5,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,906
of 302,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#146
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.