You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computer-based cognitive interventions for mild cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults: protocol for a systematic review of published studies and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1146-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abdullah Al Mahmud, Reneta Slikboer, Jennifer Stargatt, Sunil Bhar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,419,461
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,406
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,014
of 340,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#21
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.