You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
High throughput procedure utilising chlorophyll fluorescence imaging to phenotype dynamic photosynthesis and photoprotection in leaves under controlled gaseous conditions
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0485-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lorna McAusland, Jonathan A. Atkinson, Tracy Lawson, Erik H. Murchie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 26% |
Netherlands | 3 | 13% |
Spain | 2 | 9% |
India | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 12 | 52% |
Members of the public | 9 | 39% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
Professor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 14% |
Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 53% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,388,757
of 24,077,652 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#114
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,973
of 346,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,077,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.