↓ Skip to main content

Silica coating influences the corona and biokinetics of cerium oxide nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Silica coating influences the corona and biokinetics of cerium oxide nanoparticles
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12989-015-0106-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nagarjun V. Konduru, Renato J. Jimenez, Archana Swami, Sherri Friend, Vincent Castranova, Philip Demokritou, Joseph D. Brain, Ramon M. Molina

Abstract

The physicochemical properties of nanoparticles (NPs) influence their biological outcomes. We assessed the effects of an amorphous silica coating on the pharmacokinetics and pulmonary effects of CeO2 NPs following intratracheal (IT) instillation, gavage and intravenous injection in rats. Uncoated and silica-coated CeO2 NPs were generated by flame spray pyrolysis and later neutron-activated. These radioactive NPs were IT-instilled, gavaged, or intravenously (IV) injected in rats. Animals were analyzed over 28 days post-IT, 7 days post-gavage and 2 days post-injection. Our data indicate that silica coating caused more but transient lung inflammation compared to uncoated CeO2. The transient inflammation of silica-coated CeO2 was accompanied by its enhanced clearance. Then, from 7 to 28 days, clearance was similar although significantly more (141)Ce from silica-coated (35 %) was cleared than from uncoated (19 %) (141)CeO2 in 28 days. The protein coronas of the two NPs were significantly different when they were incubated with alveolar lining fluid. Despite more rapid clearance from the lungs, the extrapulmonary (141)Ce from silica-coated (141)CeO2 was still minimal (<1 %) although lower than from uncoated (141)CeO2 NPs. Post-gavage, nearly 100 % of both NPs were excreted in the feces consistent with very low gut absorption. Both IV-injected (141)CeO2 NP types were primarily retained in the liver and spleen. The silica coating significantly altered the plasma protein corona composition and enhanced retention of (141)Ce in other organs except the liver. We conclude that silica coating of nanoceria alters the biodistribution of cerium likely due to modifications in protein corona formation after IT and IV administration.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bulgaria 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 32%
Researcher 13 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Other 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 18%
Environmental Science 6 12%
Materials Science 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,401,269
of 25,104,329 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#299
of 609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,689
of 285,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,104,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.