↓ Skip to main content

Ozone acting on human blood yields a hormetic dose-response relationship

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ozone acting on human blood yields a hormetic dose-response relationship
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-9-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Velio A Bocci, Iacopo Zanardi, Valter Travagli

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze why ozone can be medically useful when it dissolves in blood or in other biological fluids. In reviewing a number of clinical studies performed in Peripheral Arterial Diseases (PAD) during the last decades, it has been possible to confirm the long-held view that the inverted U-shaped curve, typical of the hormesis concept, is suitable to represent the therapeutic activity exerted by the so-called ozonated autohemotherapy. The quantitative and qualitative aspects of human blood ozonation have been also critically reviewed in regard to the biological, therapeutic and safety of ozone. It is hoped that this gas, although toxic for the pulmonary system during prolonged inhalation, will be soon recognized as a useful agent in oxidative-stress related diseases, joining other medical gases recently thought to be of therapeutic importance. Finally, the elucidation of the mechanisms of action of ozone as well as the obtained results in PAD may encourage clinical scientists to evaluate ozone therapy in vascular diseases in comparison to the current therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 168 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 19%
Researcher 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 12 7%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 53 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 59 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,784,237
of 25,235,161 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#839
of 4,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,997
of 117,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,235,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.