↓ Skip to main content

Celiac disease in type 1 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Italian Journal of Pediatrics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Celiac disease in type 1 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Italian Journal of Pediatrics, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1824-7288-38-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camarca, Maria Erminia, Mozzillo, Enza, Nugnes, Rosa, Zito, Eugenio, Falco, Mariateresa, Fattorusso, Valentina, Mobilia, Sara, Buono, Pietro, Valerio, Giuliana, Troncone, Riccardo, Franzese, Adriana, Maria Erminia Camarca, Enza Mozzillo, Rosa Nugnes, Eugenio Zito, Mariateresa Falco, Valentina Fattorusso, Sara Mobilia, Pietro Buono, Giuliana Valerio, Riccardo Troncone, Adriana Franzese

Abstract

Celiac Disease (CD) occurs in patients with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) ranging the prevalence of 4.4-11.1% versus 0.5% of the general population. The mechanism of association of these two diseases involves a shared genetic background: HLA genotype DR3-DQ2 and DR4-DQ8 are strongly associated with T1D, DR3-DQ2 with CD. The classical severe presentation of CD rarely occurs in T1D patients, but more often patients have few/mild symptoms of CD or are completely asymptomatic (silent CD). In fact diagnosis of CD is regularly performed by means of the screening in T1D patients. The effects of gluten-free diet (GFD) on the growth and T1D metabolic control in CD/T1D patient are controversial. Regarding of the GFD composition, there is a debate on the higher glycaemic index of gluten-free foods respect to gluten-containing foods; furthermore GFD could be poorer of fibers and richer of fat. The adherence to GFD by children with CD-T1D has been reported generally below 50%, lower respect to the 73% of CD patients, a lower compliance being more frequent among asymptomatic patients. The more severe problems of GFD adherence usually occur during adolescence when in GFD non compliant subjects the lowest quality of life is reported. A psychological and educational support should be provided for these patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 26 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,043,647
of 11,341,982 outputs
Outputs from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#80
of 398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,681
of 104,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Italian Journal of Pediatrics
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,341,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 398 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.