↓ Skip to main content

Numerical model of a valvuloplasty balloon: in vitro validation in a rapid-prototyped phantom

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Numerical model of a valvuloplasty balloon: in vitro validation in a rapid-prototyped phantom
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12938-016-0155-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benedetta Biffi, Giorgia M. Bosi, Valentina Lintas, Rod Jones, Spyros Tzamtzis, Gaetano Burriesci, Francesco Migliavacca, Andrew M. Taylor, Silvia Schievano, Giovanni Biglino

Abstract

Patient-specific simulations can provide insight into the mechanics of cardiovascular procedures. Amongst cardiovascular devices, non-compliant balloons are used in several minimally invasive procedures, such as balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Although these balloons are often included in the computer simulations of these procedures, validation of the balloon behaviour is often lacking. We therefore aim to create and validate a computational model of a valvuloplasty balloon. A finite element (FE) model of a valvuloplasty balloon (Edwards 9350BC23) was designed, including balloon geometry and material properties from tensile testing. Young's Modulus and distensibility of different rapid prototyping (RP) rubber-like materials were evaluated to identify the most suitable compound to reproduce the mechanical properties of calcified arteries in which such balloons are likely to be employed clinically. A cylindrical, simplified implantation site was 3D printed using the selected material and the balloon was inflated inside it. The FE model of balloon inflation alone and its interaction with the cylinder were validated by comparison with experimental Pressure-Volume (P-V) and diameter-Volume (d-V) curves. Root mean square errors (RMSE) of pressure and diameter were RMSE P  = 161.98 mmHg (3.8 % of the maximum pressure) and RMSE d  = 0.12 mm (<0.5 mm, within the acquisition system resolution) for the balloon alone, and RMSE P  = 94.87 mmHg (1.9 % of the maximum pressure) and RMSE d  = 0.49 mm for the balloon inflated inside the simplified implantation site, respectively. This validated computational model could be used to virtually simulate more realistic valvuloplasty interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 18 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2016.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#733
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,216
of 316,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.