↓ Skip to main content

Improved negative selection protocol for Plasmodium berghei in the rodent malarial model

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improved negative selection protocol for Plasmodium berghei in the rodent malarial model
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachael Y Orr, Nisha Philip, Andrew P Waters

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Student > Master 18 22%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,320,000
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#5,334
of 5,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,155
of 161,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#64
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.