↓ Skip to main content

Mental health first aid for Indigenous Australians: using Delphi consensus studies to develop guidelines for culturally appropriate responses to mental health problems

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mental health first aid for Indigenous Australians: using Delphi consensus studies to develop guidelines for culturally appropriate responses to mental health problems
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-9-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura M Hart, Anthony F Jorm, Leonard G Kanowski, Claire M Kelly, Robyn L Langlands

Abstract

Ethnic minority groups are under-represented in mental health care services because of barriers such as poor mental health literacy. In 2007, the Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) program implemented a cultural adaptation of its first aid course to improve the capacity of Indigenous Australians to recognise and respond to mental health issues within their own communities. It became apparent that the content of this training would be improved by the development of best practice guidelines. This research aimed to develop culturally appropriate guidelines for providing first aid to an Australian Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander person who is experiencing a mental health crisis or developing a mental illness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 199 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 43 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 31%
Social Sciences 27 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 54 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,378,772
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,176
of 4,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,708
of 110,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.