↓ Skip to main content

Improving biomarker list stability by integration of biological knowledge in the learning process

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving biomarker list stability by integration of biological knowledge in the learning process
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-s4-s22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiziana Sanavia, Fabio Aiolli, Giovanni Da San Martino, Andrea Bisognin, Barbara Di Camillo

Abstract

The identification of robust lists of molecular biomarkers related to a disease is a fundamental step for early diagnosis and treatment. However, methodologies for biomarker discovery using microarray data often provide results with limited overlap. It has been suggested that one reason for these inconsistencies may be that in complex diseases, such as cancer, multiple genes belonging to one or more physiological pathways are associated with the outcomes. Thus, a possible approach to improve list stability is to integrate biological information from genomic databases in the learning process; however, a comprehensive assessment based on different types of biological information is still lacking in the literature. In this work we have compared the effect of using different biological information in the learning process like functional annotations, protein-protein interactions and expression correlation among genes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 28%
Computer Science 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 9 17%