You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A historical and proteomic analysis of botulinum neurotoxin type/G
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Microbiology, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-11-232 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca R Terilli, Hercules Moura, Adrian R Woolfitt, Jon Rees, David M Schieltz, John R Barr |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 29% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#869
of 3,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,982
of 140,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.