↓ Skip to main content

Biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients with spinal metastases after resistance training under radiotherapy – a randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients with spinal metastases after resistance training under radiotherapy – a randomized trial
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12885-016-2278-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harald Rief, Georg Omlor, Michael Akbar, Thomas Bruckner, Stefan Rieken, Robert Förster, Ingmar Schlampp, Thomas Welzel, Tilman Bostel, Heinz Jürgen Roth, Jürgen Debus

Abstract

To compare the effects of resistance training versus passive physical therapy on bone turnover markers (BTM) in the metastatic bone during radiation therapy (RT) in patients with spinal bone metastases. Secondly, to evaluate an association of BTM to local response, skeletal-related events (SRE), and number of metastases. In this randomized trial, 60 patients were allocated from September 2011 to March 2013 into one of the two arms: resistance training (Arm A) or passive physical therapy (Arm B) with thirty patients in each arm during RT. Biochemical markers such as pyridinoline (PYD), desoxy-pyridinoline (DPD), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), total amino-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), beta-isomer of carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I), and cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) were analyzed at baseline, and three months after RT. Mean change values of PYD and CTX-I were significantly lower at 3 months after RT (p = 0.035 and p = 0.043) in Arm A. Importantly, all markers decreased in both arms, except of PYD and CTX-I in arm B, although significance was not reached for some biomarkers. In arm A, the local response was significantly higher (p = 0.003) and PINP could be identified as a predictor for survivors (OR 0.968, 95%CI 0.938-0.999, p = 0.043). BAP (OR 0.974, 95%CI 0.950-0.998, p = 0.034) and PINP (OR 1.025, 95%CI 1.001-1.049, p = 0.044) were related with an avoidance of SRE. In this group of patients with spinal bone metastases, we were able to show that patients with guided resistance training of the paravertebral muscles can influence BTM. PYD and CTX-I decreased significantly in arm A. PINP can be considered as a complementary tool for prediction of local response, and PINP as well as BAP for avoidance of SRE. Clinical trial identifier NCT 01409720. August 2, 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 125 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 18%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 38 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 19%
Sports and Recreations 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 43 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,693,540
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,397
of 8,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,145
of 326,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#31
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,320 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.