↓ Skip to main content

Clinical audit for occupational therapy intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder: sampling steps and sample size calculation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical audit for occupational therapy intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder: sampling steps and sample size calculation
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1247-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott Weeks, Alvin Atlas

Abstract

A priori sample size calculations are used to determine the adequate sample size to estimate the prevalence of the target population with good precision. However, published audits rarely report a priori calculations for their sample size. This article discusses a process in health services delivery mapping to generate a comprehensive sampling frame, which was used to calculate an a priori sample size for a targeted clinical record audit. We describe how we approached methodological and definitional issues in the following steps: (1) target population definition, (2) sampling frame construction, and (3) a priori sample size calculation. We recommend this process for clinicians, researchers, or policy makers when detailed information on a reference population is unavailable.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 31%
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Lecturer 2 6%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Engineering 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 5 14%